What a difference a day makes..

ryan5-720

What a day. The #justice flag arrived at Glastonbury, Change People held a conference in which energy sizzled across twitter with 1.3 million mentions. Oxfordshire Family Support Network published their Healthwatch funded report and the legendary Phil Gayle and team produced a one hour special about learning disability provision* in Oxfordshire.

A one hour special. Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow. This team have meticulously and carefully reported on unfolding events for the best part of a year now. Today they captured the views of Andrew Smith MP, Paul and Jackie Scarrott, Josh Will’s dad, Phil, Mencap, John Jackson from Oxfordshire County Council and Norman Lamb. I was the link herb across the programme. My brain pinging around in random ways hearing the different contributions and my heart howling at various points. Occasionally lifting when I heard strong and sensible declarations of not accepting the unacceptable.

The big news underpinning the morning show was that Sloven are unlikely to have the contract for learning disability provision in Oxfordshire renewed next year. A bit of a public blow and embarrassment given the five year expectation involved in taking over Ridgeway in November 2012. Sue Harriman, working out her notice before she scarpers, was the obvious talking head pulled in to describe disappointment and some candid reflection about getting it wrong. Katrina Percy was, as usual, invisible. The importance of fronting up the public failure of the Slovens to provide adequate care for the group against which the quality of all trusts should be measured, completely lost on her. Sloven social media tweeted about safety in swimming pools abroad.

I’m left wondering what happens to the Slade House site if the Sloven contract isn’t extended? The place where I took LB wearing his ELC police tabard and orange binoculars to draw the brown lines for the crapshite clinician. The place we drove past a billion times over the years. For trips to here, there and everywhere. The place we took LB to in January, for a ‘crisis’ appointment with the community psychiatrist. The place we eventually, took him eight weeks later. To become an inpatient. A place that didn’t understand what a patient was.

It’s a tasty chunk of prime developmental land.

*Andrew Smith is at 2.07, Jan Sunman at 2.39 and the one hour programme starts at 3.05, available for one week.

 

Landscape for a Sparrowhawk

ryan5-716After the last couple of miserable, raging posts, here’s a snifter of sunshine, light and colour. #107days continues to be extraordinary. A truly unique campaign. Fundraising is a go go. We’re ticking off some of the items on the Connor Manifesto which is amazing. The tender is out for the Serious Case Review, jointly commissioned by NHS England and Oxfordshire Adult Safeguarding Board. This has a broad remit, to add to and extend the Verita findings. The terms of reference for the review into unexpected deaths in Sloven learning disability and mental health services are being decided at the mo. And the police are conducting a full investigation. Our lovely CID guy called with the news yesterday. LB would be seriously delighted with this decision. His belief in the criminal justice system undented.

Finally, Landscape for a Sparrowhawk, by the remarkable Janet Read (started on the train on the way to LB’s funeral that hot summer’s day last July) is now above the fireplace in our front room.

The spirit and essence of our beautiful dude woven into our lives in so many ways.

Removing the wing mirrors

Had a full on week, last week. Monday, the Partnership Steering Group’s one day conference at Manchester University, Day 82, #107days. An event shared and chaired by learning disabled people throughout. Tuesday, a meeting with our MP, Andrew Smith, and Deborah Coles from INQUEST. Wednesday evening, Rich and I hung out with young people at a group run by My Life My Choice and Parasol. They wanted to talk about LB. Anger, rage, disbelief and bafflement that he was left to bath unsupervised.

Friday, the Cardiff Law School’s conference, Deprivation of Liberty Procedures (Safeguards for whom?), at the Law Society. LB’s artwork illustrated the flyer and Paul Bowen, QC, dedicated his paper to #107days. The bar (sorry) preventing the involvement, engagement and recognition of learning disabled people as full citizens is clearly under assault.

That morning, I  walked from the hotel to the Law Society and realised within minutes I was going to pass LB’s favourite shop of all time. One of the spaces that anchored London as his favourite city and his longstanding desire to ‘be a Londoner Mum’. Model Zone. At the far end of Oxford Street. Model Zone. Where LB would carefully snap the wing mirrors off thoughtfully selected, hugely expensive, limited edition die cast coaches before leaving the shop. With an audience of gawpers. He’d learned over time, and a shedload of distress, that these would break at some point and found a way of managing that moment of inevitability.

I instantly got that now familiar feeling of part primal howl, part panic attack, instant blurred vision and countering internal steeling of ‘deep.breath.deep.breath…’

MZ was shut. Boarded up and being redeveloped.

ryan5-710

Eh?

Closed?

……? When? How?

I googled it on my ipad in a nearby doorway. They went bust days before LB died.

[???] …

Walking on to Chancery Lane, I carefully removed the wing mirrors as LB learned to do over time. Model Zone was shut. A piece of his childhood gone. A space we shared and enjoyed. Better it was shut than experiencing the pain of seeing punters carrying on die cast model life without the quirky young dude who broke all the rules of die cast model ownership. With care.

Inquest and inequity

Had a meeting at lunchtime with Deborah Coles and Selen Cavcav from INQUEST and Andrew Smith, our MP, today as part of #107days. The meeting was at Portcullis House. A building with a random, mini airport type security gig going on that is breathtaking. Bags scanned. Bodies scanned and ordered in out, in out, shake it all about. Patted down by serious, super silent, severe security people. Wow.

Instead of leaving on a jet plane (sadly), we went through to an enormous atrium to grab a drink from the heavily subsidised cafe and up to Andrew Smith’s office. Wow. I’m clearly in the wrong business. An office/room/corner space with a view that captured the London Eye, the Thames, parliament buildings, Big Ben… Wow.

It turns out Andrew Smith has lived in Blackbird Leys for years (thirty four years). I bloody love this fact and I bloody love his office. But this wasn’t about spaces. It was about what he could do to help #justiceforLB. We had a fairly action packed 40 minutes or so, in which Deborah demonstrated INQUEST magic and (policy) knowledge in buckets. Key issues were discussed and plans made. These will be reported elsewhere. I just wanted to focus on one part of the discussion. The inquest and inequity that exists around inquest funding.

I got a real taste today, through hanging out with Deborah and Selen, of the centrality of the inquest. I sort of knew this but hearing it talked about made it clearer. The inquest is the mechanism by which families are able to find out exactly what happened and to explore the circumstances surrounding this. And it’s crucially important to have the right questions asked. If, as we hope, LB’s inquest comes under Article Two of the European Convention of Human Rights (he died in the care of the state), the inquest will be broader and involve more witnesses and, possibly, a jury.

The inequity kicks in when it comes to legal representation for this. The NHS (Slovens) are able to bring out the big solicitors/barristers for the inquest funded by, er, you and me. If social care are required to be there, they will be able to draw on a legal team funded by, yep, you and me. If the Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group, likewise. So health and social care can draw on the public purse to provide top level representation to defend themselves against families of patients who have died (howl).

And families? They have to foot their legal representation. To stand firm in the face of the NHS legal team and get someone other than themselves to ask the questions, they have to fund the legal costs themselves. There is some Legal Help that is means tested and covers the costs of pre-inquest preparation and early advice but representation in the inquest is unfunded outside of the exceptional fund.

I’m not going to go into the nitty gritty of the hoops involved in trying to crack the exceptional fund. I just wonder how it can be possible that LB died a preventable death in the care of the Slovens, and they can effortlessly draw on unlimited legal support to defend the indefensible while we have to stump up, or fundraise (thank you everyone who has contributed) £1000s?

?

It’s so wrong, it almost takes your breath away. And. Where, in any of this vile, hideous, inhumane process is there any consideration of the compete and utter pain we are experiencing?

I left the meeting pleased it was positive. And, within moments, so blinking sad that LB never got to see the newly designed Routemaster buses pretty much nose to nose along my walk back to the coach stop.

 

The days afterwards… sharing experiences

I found out the fullish details of the unexpected death of another dude we knew about in Oxfordshire this afternoon. Kind of lucky (is that the right word?) I had the day off. His mum (I’ll call her Maria for now) was worried about how upsetting it would be for me to read this. Yeah. It was. As upsetting I’m sure as it was for her to write it.

It was also shocking. And harrowing. Damning of health and social care for dudes. And so illustrative of how completely inconsequential our dudes lives are to those who are paid to provide care and support for them. Not necessarily to those who actually work directly with them, but certainly pretty much everyone above that tier. How can this be?

I just wanted to flag up a few things that leapt out at me now about those early days.

When an unexpected death happens within the NHS, families have no idea of “the process” about to unfold. And not knowing means that the NHS holds all the power and, probably reasonably regularly, the ability to keep things unexplored, unexplained and out of the public domain. I know in the post-Francis world of candour and transparency this should no longer be the case. But as the old world shows no real signs of waking up and joining in, I’d advise families to think the worst. Sadly.

I was contacted pretty much straightaway (on twitter I think) by a wonderful barrister who had been reading my blog. She advised contacting INQUEST immediately. I think I spoke to her the day or so after LB died but I can’t quite remember. It was such an unimaginable time. I emailed INQUEST on the Monday morning so suspect I must have done.

inquest

LB died on the Thursday not the Monday. This email alone illuminates how fucked up the system is. Can you imagine emailing an organisation less than four days after your child’s death in hospital to ask for advice? Advice? How can this be?

At the same time, it underlines how important it is to be informed. Within four hours of sending this email an INQUEST caseworker was in touch and phoned to explain exactly what would happen, what we needed to do and what to expect. It was a terrible shock. The cuddly NHS suddenly seemed a whole lot less cuddly.  We were recommended a solicitor within days and I was making calls to the Coroner’s Office to demand that LB’s autopsy was done properly. Can you imagine?

Maria and her partner weren’t given early warning of what they should do and what lay ahead of them. So they dealt with different horrors. Just as damaging. What was similar were the throwaway emails from Ridgeway/Sloven Health. ‘If there’s anything we can do’… type comments. These statements are so awful they should be banned from any interaction to do with unexpected deaths in the NHS (or any setting really). How are you supposed to respond? Where on earth do you start given where you are? What can you do? What are you offering? What do you mean?

Maria’s husband received a mobile phone message from the manager of her son’s ‘care’ home stating they should let him know if he could ‘help with the funeral arrangements’. Eh? You’ve just found out your child is dead and some suit is lobbing meaningless ‘small talk’ at you. Vague comments around ‘help with funeral arrangements’ is nonsensical to a bereaved parent. What help? Making sandwiches? Finding a venue? Stumping up the cost? Choosing a coffin? Deciding on burial or cremation?? It’s at best a careless offer and at worst a dirty trick. To tick a box and scarper as far from the fake offer as quickly as possible. Not sure there needs to be much of a sprint at this point as I can’t imagine many parents/family members will pipe up with any suggested ways of helping.

I don’t know but suspect this whole vile crap, uncomfortable offer comes from empty policies coloured by the discomforting thought of unexpected death within an organisation designed to sustain health. I’d suggest get over the discomfort and work out the type of support families in such situations would want (practical support like food, cleaning, clothes washing, money to cover being out of work, funeral costs, paying bills, contact with schools/university/employers, emotional support like counselling, etc, etc) or withdraw the empty offer. Even with good intentions it all becomes nonsensical given the seemingly unavoidably enormous costs involved in preventing the NHS steamrollering over what’s happened.

Er, yes, thanks, can you provide the egg sarnies at the funeral? Cheers…” [Up to £25-30,000 of legal costs? Wha??? … ]

In the meantime, the anniversary of LB’s death is getting closer. Something I’ve been able to avoid dwelling on largely because of the remarkable distraction of #107days. If any influential NHS or related peeps want to openly chuck their Post-Francis commitment and belief into the transparent, democratic and collective joyfulness captured in these days of actions, I’m sure we can fit you into existing days. In the spirit of making the incomprehensible/baffling simpler. And hopefully to show early steps to different ways of doing and being.

An antidote to the obscene. And inhumane.

“A place I call home”

Warning: It’s 12.30am. I’m on Madison time after a full on, action packed four days in the States followed by Epic Party Night. My ability to think, write and judge is probably a bit wonky. I just caught up with the latest ‘news’ from the Winterbourne Joint Improvement Programme and I’m going to be a bit short and to the point. LB died (he died?) and I really don’t want to hear more shite about shite.

    1. Ditch the niceties and stop thinking there is some “treat” space to ‘focus energies and attention on what can be achieved’. Real people are experiencing crapshite experiences that would not be acceptable to most people’s pets.  Stating ‘We are where we are’ as if there is, or has been, no agency involved is offensive and unacceptable.
    2. The passive, hopeless ‘we’ve only got a year to go so what can we achieve?’ is nails on blackboard stuff. If you take on a tough gig, you should really have an understanding of the terrain.
    3. Ditch the ‘we must give hope to the individuals and families who are currently in hospital settings…’ Those individuals and families really don’t need your empty words. They have a much more sophisticated understanding of the landscape of provision and horror they or their family members are experiencing. They want action.
    4. ‘We must not decide the challenge is too difficult and give up’. Er. Not sure what this is supposed to mean/achieve. But if you want to bung me whatever salary scale to work within such parameters, please do. “Ah, thank you NHS/social care employer, I took on the task with good faith but the challenge was a bit tricksy so I’m giving up… Oh and that tiny blip about abuse in one of my residential provisions? We really don’t need to go there, I’m doing my best…”
    5. ‘I’m pleased to announce there has been a 100% return from NHS local and national commissioners’. Eh? So there is a choice attached to providing these figures?  As ever, I can’t help wondering if there is some sort of longstanding joke going on. The whole system seems to be hamstrung by nonsensical demands and yet in areas in which attention really needs to be focused, there is an ‘opt in’ attitude.
    6. Stating ‘if you want to know what the situation is in your area please do ask your local CCG’ is a bit like saying ‘Rarra hoo ho, bolowlo, bloooblom gara‘. Most people don’t know what a ‘CCG’ is and if they do, contacting them is one of those mysterious (utterly frustrating) processes.
    7. The discrepancy between the figures and ‘what was agreed by the partners in the Concordat’ is something you should be dealing with. Presenting a set of unexplained figures that don’t fit with the model of what you expected to achieve at this point, with a bit of a curious question mark attached is, erm, fucking unacceptable.
    8. Not sure now you have ‘robust and detailed quarterly figures’ this will actually lead to change.
    9. Talking in terms of ‘local heroes’ is pretty offensive. It shouldn’t be seen as ‘heroic’ to provide appropriate support/provision.
    10. As I always bang on about, the focus on the well being of people who were in Winterbourne View ignores people in other, similar settings.
    11. ”Unsticking’ complex situations’… ? Eh? What does this mean?

Basically, what a pile of old crap. It strikes me that we have an extreme case of provision for a group of people that no one cares for or about, other than their family (if they have one), that have a historically designated space (despite a body of evidence that challenges this space) in which all bets are off. Restrain, medicate and leave to fester. And yet Commissioners can find around £200,000 per year to keep people in places you wouldn’t leave your dog in for a weekend.

LB died (he died?). Can you imagine? Can you imagine your 18 year old son losing his life through sheer carelessness in a hospital? Nearly a year ago now. The only concrete response other than the crap hole unit he was in closing (which is a cheap shot to avoid actually changing provision), is a blanket ban on bathing for remaining patients in the next door unit.

I want to ask the Winterbourne JIP/Department of Health/NHS England;

What the fuck are you actually doing?

What have you done all this time?

How much funding has been spent on the Winterbourne JIP?

 

The Epic Party Night

ryan5-689

Last night was ‘the party night to end all Justice for LB party nights’ (Day 73 of #107days). We don’t do things by halves on this campaign. There was a two pronged approach to this night; a big bash at the Oxford Sports and Social Club organised by Becca and the life raft and an English Country Dance at Bletchingdon Village Hall organised by Caroline. I work with Caroline and she came to the JR hospital with me on July 4th last year. I don’t know what it’s like to be with someone in such unspeakable circumstances (my mate Mary who works in A&E was also there). Caroline shared that experience.

ryan5-679The big bash caused Becca and the gang quite a few sleepless nights. Volunteers queued up instantly – two great bands from Oxford (Mean Montage and Yowash), Alan Joyce, the bacon bap seller from outside Oxford Rail Station, NansforJustice who covered the cost of the room which was offered to us at a great rate by Jenny O’Loughlin, the General Manager at the Oxford Sports and Social Club (OSSC). The most stylish tickets imaginable were designed by Vic, Sam and Trev from Identica, and LNS Print produced em for free. Frog Orange produced an Eddie Stobart themed balloon bouquet and backdrop ‘LB’.

The ticket sales were less hot off the press and given the ballroom at OSSC holds hundreds, there were some anxious moments around ending up with a handful of peeps kicking around awkwardly in the face of such generous contributions. This was an anxiety Becca, her family (particularly Chris, Rory and Julian) and the life raft absorbed and ran with. And, on the night, there was a brilliant turnout. Nothing like a bit of ‘if you build it they will come’ with a hefty dose of behind the scenes organisational graft and magic.

And it was a truly great party. The music was fab, the baps and ice cream fantastic. Charlie’s Angels were there along with other school staff, LB’s classmates, friends, family, Parasol, the young dude from Day 41 and many, many more.

ryan5-681

What helped make it such a good party was the space. The giant ballroom (Emperor Ballroom) at the OSSC is a legendary space; enormous, vintage decor, opening out onto a patio (right word?) with tables and chairs,  a cricket pitch and playing fields. With a good value bar. It’s a space that allows different levels of party going/attendance and young kids/dudes or adults to randomly roam, run, spin, withdraw, play a spontaneous game of footy and/or dance their socks off.

ryan5-686 For us, it’s a space in which Rosie stood in for Rich when she was about 12 to hand out medals to the tiny footy team he coached (and she assisted) in his absence. A fear inducing experience she carried off brilliantly. Around the same time, Rich was hoiked out of the enormous line dancing class we went to for being too disruptive. He was made to first stand at the front, then excluded. Last night he returned to the stage in triumph as The Amazing Geoffrey and Kid Rage (aka Rich and Busker John) did a short set of LB’s fave songs to a delighted audience. Their first ever gig together.

ryan5-683

It’s also where we held the party after LB’s do last July.

Sad times that the club is due for demolition in 2016. But an epic ‘party night to end all Justice for LB party nights’.  In Bletchingdon and Roman Way, Cowley. LB would have loved it.

ryan5-688

 

At what cost and who really cares?

Extract from a special Inquiry.

‘We now report, with sadness, our findings and, in a spirit of hopefulness, make our recommendations […] We believe the public, as a matter of right, as well as by reason of the fact that it pays for the NHS, is entitled to sound and reliable standards from those employed to administer it’. 

Principal conclusions; the failure of staff to cooperate (largely because of the actions of the consultant psychiatrist who, through arrogance, withdrew from the original inquiry), the failure of duty by the area local authority and lack of effective monitoring by the regional health authority. A lack of implementing current government policy. No evidence (pretty much) of cruelty or ill-treatment of patients but extremely low standards of nursing care and accompanying poor quality of life of patients. A lack of effective nursing leadership.

A few years earlier, a member of staff flagged up that nursing staff ‘had lost their way’. A report pretty much ignored. Eighteen months later an officer visited the hospital and was disturbed by what she saw. Her views were ignored and no substantial improvement effected. Aside from some excellent nurses, there was excessive and improper use of seclusion.

The hospital buildings were neglected and dangerous. Standards of hygiene were often appalling. Faeces and urine were left unattended. Morale was extremely low and could be attributed to the psychiatrist who was a poor appointment in terms of personality. Other medical colleagues were reluctant to work there because of the ‘current practices‘.

Administration was poor at every level with no clear lines of communication. When the hospital was taken over after reorganisation it was already run down and experiencing difficulties. The ‘new administration at an area level adopted a philosophy of seeking to improve the situation by non-intervention and persuasion. This policy was soon shown to be ineffectual but it was nevertheless persisted in for too long. […] Even though there was a failure on the part of certain members of the area management team to keep their colleagues properly informed of adversed developments, the area management team was well aware that the situation was deteriorating but lacked either the will or the skills to do anything about it. There were fitful, sporadic manifestations of concern, but regrettably, these were often more ritualistic than realistic contributions to a resolution of the difficulties.’

A ‘wait and see‘ attitude was adopted at regional level despite knowledge of the price of waiting paid by patients.


The Normansfield Inquiry, 1978

Thanks to Chris Hatton for tweeting this link earlier. 

 

Weaving, ducking and diving

Just a few rambling thoughts about the latest news, schmooze and misery to emerge this week. On Saturday news broke (in the most low key news breaking way possible) of alleged ‘bullying’ at a small residential school for learning disabled children run by a provider, MacIntyre, in Wales. Saba Salman provides a summary of this story here. Abuse Bullying at any provision for learning disabled people, particularly children, you’d think would be ‘news’ post Winterbourne.

Particularly if the CEO of the provider involved is the new lead of the Winterbourne Joint Improvement Programme (JIP). But the link wasn’t made.

NHS England also published the latest dismal stats/update around the JIP. No words really. I suspect some of the people involved must be looking back and thinking “Why the fuck did we call ourselves a concordat?”

Good intentions I’m sure at the heart of this group/concordat. At the same time I’m getting a bit uncomfortable about the constant waving of the ‘Winterbourne’ flag. Particularly given the abuse and neglect identified at STATT, Piggy Lane, Evenlode and now Womaston (the latter run by a very respected provider). Consistently referring back to one particular moment among so many is a bit self defeating really. I say this without wanting in any way to detract/play down the utter horror experienced by the patients/families at Winterbourne View.

The link between Bill Mumford and the school was made on twitter on Sunday. Today he issued a heartfelt personal statement; Doing the right thing. Action has clearly been taken, the police are involved, etc etc etc. Etc with bells on.

What’s the problem with this?

Well this really:

Bill Mumford

And what this means.

And?

How long does it take to approve a personal statement about abuse discovered in March? By a concordat who, er, have seemingly achieved little else? In a timely fashion, the JIP approved the statement two days after it almost became news.

I’m confused/alarmed about the ‘power of the process’ in instances of horror involving state organisations to keep things secret. What we could and couldn’t (and can’t) say about LB’s experiences seems to be mediated by the spectre of various processes that lie ahead (the police investigation/the inquest). What this really means is a bit of a mystery really.

Now that BBC Wales has reported the allegations at Womaston, the publishing of statements by MacIntyre and Bill Mumford suggest that the secrecy aspect is a little bit contrived.

Another interpretation to the above is that there was a bit of (explicit or implicit) wishful/hopeful thinking that the link between Bill and the school wouldn’t be made. That a bit of abuse bullying at a small school in Wales would be largely ignored by the media. Not an outlandish wish in the circumstances. Again, quite possibly with the ‘best intentions’ in line with concordat aspirations. Not rocking a rocky boat and all that.

A third interpretation is that the workings of top level dealings in this area are so infused with incompetence that reaction rather than action is the norm. The old procrastination model.

I don’t know which of the above fits the Bill, if any. But I hope, if I was anything to do with a concordat (sigh), and/or head of a leading light provider and abuse bullying happened on my patch, I’d shout from the rooftops about it. To alert the whole shebang (people, families, commissioners, providers, NHS England, local authorities, social workers, teachers, support workers, clinicians, health professionals, whoever) that this shite happens. And if it can happen in my blinking state of the art (in the context) organisation, it could happen in yours.

It’s time to cut the crap, whatever shape that takes. These are people’s lives we’re talking about.

Poohead and wnakers

ryan5-168

Yesterday John Williams adopted Day 57 of #107days and dedicated his comedy show, ‘My son’s not Rainman’, to LB. He was performing at the Kenton Theatre in Henley along with Dave Griffith, aka King Cnut. Dave in a bizarre coincidence given we’ve followed each other on twitter for a while, is actually Will and Owen’s uncle. Funny world. The show was a sell out.

ryan5-167

John (I think I can call him that now as we had a big old hug and he is like one of those people you feel like you’ve known your whole life) was hilarious. He captured the whole randomness of life with a dude like LB and his son, Fin with the funniest of funny anecdotes. Stories of crazy golf, blue tac and biting. A letter his son wrote him when he went away, signed ‘lost and lost of love’ with a matchstick drawing of the pair of them. A letter he later defaced adding Poohead and drawing a turd on his dad’s head. We laughed till we cried. What made the show so powerful was the deep love and affection that John openly demonstrated for Fin throughout. And what was even more blinking brilliant was how much the audience laughed, everyone getting a dose of a wonderful dad son relationship that is just a bit different.

John ended with a massive shout out for LB, #107days and played Divine Comedy/LB film on the big screen. More tears…

After Marcus Richardson’s debut as a comedy poet (very, very funny with moves that have no name), it was King Cnut’s turn with ‘C U in Court’. This is a hilarious story about ‘the little man’ taking on a giant corporation over the use of ‘CNUT (French Correction)’ on t-shirts. Dave’s strong sense of justice combined with remarkable determination and tenacity meant he not only refused to be bullied by the French Connection monster (who seem to have PR/Comms staff fresh from the Sloven School of Staff Training) but became an expert in trademark law and set about policing their design activities. Brilliantly funny and astonishing.

It was a right old belly laugh of an evening and seeing John at the end of the show, working his bollocks off selling LB’s postcards in the foyer was awesome. 58 days of something you couldn’t make up.

ryan5-165