The Unit. Day 63

You know that saying; that things can’t get worse? Well that’s turning out to be a load of old codswallop. After the whole CPA meeting surprise (see yesterday’s cheeky little number for details) and, as yet, no sniff of what the future might hold for LB (Don’t. Just don’t even mention support), I went to visit him yesterday evening. He was in bed, dozing. With a bitten swollen tongue. Signs of a seizure. Or size of an elephant it might well have been.

The bitten tongue had been noted and Bonjela on order. The seizure dimension overlooked. LB’s seizures have always worried the pants off me. Not least because it took about four ‘in your face’ tonic clonic epics before the docs would even entertain the idea that he might have epilepsy. We were tripping over that old ‘he’s got to learn to manage his stress/star charts anyone?’ chestnut (a.k.a. the learning disability trump card) for months.

The thought of him having a seizure, in a locked unit, unnoticed, has generated a new level of distress I can’t describe.  I don’t care how old he is, and I certainly ain’t treating him like a child, but I want to comfort him, and keep a watchful eye for any further seizures. And I can’t.

 

The Unit. Day 42

The excitement of the trip to the bus museum had worn off by the time we visited yesterday evening. LB was in his room, subdued, having chosen not to go to the farm (again).

Choice eh? Very, very important that learning disabled people can make these choices, we’re told. Unlike many other people, who have no choices in their everyday lives. Yeah, it’s so much better that LB is able to choose to laze about in his bedroom all day (again), than get a good day’s exercise, sunshine, fresh air, hang out with different people and be productive. My arse.

Of course loads of people would choose the room-laze option over working. But they wouldn’t be given that choice on a daily basis. They’d have to (if they could) do something productive. And more than likely want to after a few days.

I’m getting pretty naffed off with this choice charade as you can probably tell.

Anyway. Back to yesterday evening.  LB’s bedroom was snug and comfy, with the evening sun shining in. He sat leafing through his Yellow Pages, with bus magazines spread across the floor. Jug of squash on the desk. It was calm and peaceful.

“Do you like it here, LB?” Asked Rich.

“Not really, no”, he replied, without looking up.

The Unit. Day 28

Sleepless night, worrying about the end of Section 2. Then a last minute meeting at the unit this morning with LB’s head teacher, teacher, Vicki (a Charlie’s Angel), and unit team members to discuss his return to school. Bit of a rocky start to school return yesterday. He was taken to the primary site (as far as we can tell) and refused to get out of the car. “I’m confused”, he said.

Team LB Ed were impressive throughout the meeting.  I was bemused by the vigorous writing down of the descriptions they provided of LB’s decline into “CRISIS” (beginning to seriously hate this term) when I’d already told so many professionals about this, but hey ho. Engagement at any level is engagement. It was also a reminder of how dire things had got.

The gap between education and health was palpable but also manageable with flexibility and a shared concern for LB. Plans were made for him to be supported to return to Trax and the farm with unit staff accompanying him. Sensible, informed engagement.  Good. The ending of Section 2 was discussed. This would be discharged (?) today with an anticipation that he would agree to stay as an informal patient. If he wanted to come home, the mental capacity team would be called in. A further section unlikely because he’s currently a chill pill.

‘Er, can we be told whether he’s an informal patient or issued (?) with a DoLS (deprivation of liberty safeguard)?’ Oh yes. Action point; keep parents informed. No words.

The meeting finished with a new Team LB Ed/Health (Yowsers) and a general love-in about how much better LB had become over the last month. It was genuinely heartwarming and sealed with a cheeky smile from LB when we left.  “Tsk”, I said to head teacher, as she had a weep outside the unit, “The crying days are over, we’re moving on to better places”.

Later that afternoon I got a call from the unit. LB wanted to know if I was going to visit tomorrow. “Eh???? Really??? Yes of course I will. I can come now if he wants?” I hadn’t arranged to visit this afternoon because I saw him before and after the meeting this morning. After a quick check I was told, yes, LB wanted me to visit today.

Five minutes later I was driving in the sunshine, humming to the radio, loving stupidly the fact that LB was actually asking to see me.

As soon as I saw him I kind of recognised but ignored the signs. I gave him the photos of the forensic police investigating Rosie’s break-in. “YOU LIAR!!!“, he shouted, raging. And, instantly, we were back to four weeks ago.

I don’t know what’s happened since I left him there, around 6pm. I rang later and was told he was still very, very agitated. I read into that; possible restraint? Medication? Harm to staff? Almost definitely no Trax tomorrow if medicated?  A Section 3???? I don’t know.

And LB in deep, deep distress.

Now, I don’t know, they don’t know and maybe (as often is the case) we’ll never know, why he got so distressed so suddenly. I’m sure it’s to do with the fact they had to inform him of his rights and the ‘discharge’? of the section. It’s the only thing that’s changed between this morning’s chill bear dude and this afternoon. I don’t know what was said to him about this discharge from section? (Is it a set statement that’s read out, or a more measured interpretation that he might understand?) I think he thought he was coming home when I turned up tonight. What else could account for him asking if I was going to visit, and his immediate distress when I did.

He can’t possibly understand the complexities of the Mental Capacity Act or the Mental Health Act (as is the case for a lot of people including me).  To expose him to either in a “thinking” capacity is cruel and unnecessary. Especially as he doesn’t really have a choice about staying or leaving.  The system is seriously flawed.

28 days later.

The Unit. Day 14

I spoke to the psychiatrist this morning and got a proper update at last. LB has been much calmer since the first week, is undergoing continuous assessment and they are hoping to adjust his environment, rather than change him, to reduce the triggers to his aggression and anxiety. They are planning for him to return to school (for his non-school based week) after Easter and are hoping that he will agree to stay at the Unit, informally, at the end of this section in a couple of weeks time. The core ingredient during this time will be information gathering, past and present, from his family, school and the unit team.

What.a.relief. That sounds a sensible plan. And she sounded lovely.

Ten minutes later, Rich asked if I’d looked at the photography book I’d got for Mother’s Day.

“Eh? What book??” I said, looking over at the shelf he was looking at. WOW!! I’d completely forgotten about it. Mother’s Day was obliterated this year, as I’d scuttled up to Manchester early to get away from a raging LB. A long nine days before he was admitted. “Fab! O.M.G. What day is it????”
“April 3rd. Wednesday.”
OMG!!  I’ve got my hot rock massage today at 10.30!!!! Gotta scoot.”
“So today’s all about you is it Mum?” chipped in Rosie, ‘working’ (Candy *cough* Crush) at the kitchen table.
“Yep, bloody right it is.”

Keeping mum, irony and shifting capacity

It’s a tricky one, this capacity business and parenting. I deeply believe that capacity should be presumed and agree (and welcome) that “unwise or eccentric decisions don’t themselves prove lack of capacity”. I also worry that this has led to instances in which the wellbeing of learning disabled adults is compromised because “capacity” is so difficult to demonstrate in practice.

There was a roundtable discussion about Winterbourne yesterday with a range of learning disabled people (I assume/hope there were learning disabled people present), families, community groups, government ministers, policy makers and service providers. This was live tweeted by various people (see #winterbourne to follow the discussion). Families cropped up early in the discussion and there seemed to be a call to involve families rather than treat them as a problem.

winterbourneImportant, much needed discussion, but I was struck by the irony of going to visit LB with the threat of him deciding he no longer wants to see me, hanging over my head. It is quite a blast to go from being the full time carers, with very, very little support over 18 years to suddenly being removed from the equation. We have to ask for any snippet of information. The outcomes of a team meeting on Monday remain unknown to us. Again, ironically, in an attempt to not appear a batty, desperately protective mother, I didn’t ask to attend this first meeting. When the default position is the young person has capacity (without capacity being tested), the positioning of family members within the structure of the mental health service is a bit anomalous. And anomalies are odd and out of place.

Fran came round yesterday afternoon, armed with useful information from a brilliant workshop she’d been to on capacity. It was run by Luke Clements, who is an expert in this area. “He was absolutely brilliant”, she said. “Ah, him? I updated the literature review for his disabled children and the law book a few years ago. My supervisor was the co-author.” Is that ironic? I’m not sure. My research at that time was about mothers and going out in public with dudes like LB. The real irony is that LB can’t go out anymore. And my role as a mother is now contested.

The Unit. Day 3

Went to visit LB this morning, after Sue and Tina called round in the mini bus with LB’s classmates. They’d brought a lovely card and flowers. Hilariously the kids pretty much ignored me but waved like crazy at Chunky Stan. LB was in the bath when I arrived, so I hung out in the lounge playing Candy Crush. It wasn’t so much about seeing him as knowing he was OK, letting him know I was around and, for me, being in the same space as him.

Various staff members stopped to chat and the other dudes hung out too. It was enormously peaceful. The odd offer of a drink. Lunchtime came and went, a communal eating of beans on toast. Some laughter and a sense of familiarity.

A staff member (JK) we hadn’t met before pitched up. He mentioned that LB’s dad had phoned the evening before but LB had said no to sharing his health information with him.

Screeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeching brakes.

Whaaaaaaaaa????????

Oh yes. LB had the right to say no. He also had the right to say no to visitors. We should ring so the staff can ask if he wants to see us. Ehhhhhhh??? He’ll never say yes to seeing me???? I make him fill the dishwasher????? The room started to spin a bit as the extremes to which this could be taken to started to sink in. JK said that if LB wanted to appeal against his section, they would support him. Oh boy. LB with rights. That was kind of hilarious. He is going to LOVE this. We talked through this a bit more, JK talking about various past experiences with patients. The room stopped spinning.

I left after 2 hours without seeing LB. He knew I was there but chose to stay in the bath. I rang the unit later to see how he was.

“He’s been fine all afternoon, totally absorbed in his map of Ireland that K gave him. He’s been tracing road routes along it.”
“That’s brilliant. I spoke to JK earlier about seeing if LB wanted to see us, which we’ll do in future. I just wanted to say thanks for letting me hang out so much there this week. It’s been so important to get a real feel for the place, see how everyone interacts and so on. I am so impressed by what I’ve seen.”
“That’s great and no problem at all,”
J replied cheerfully. “We’re here to support the families as well as the patients.

I’m off to have a piece of coffee cake now. And wait to be served the court documents.