Slumber, absurdities and a tumbleweed collective

The independent Mazars death review, just by way of a speedy update, was commissioned by NHS England to examine all deaths in Sloven’s learning disability/mental health provision from 2011-2015. The review is in apparently indefinite quarantine by NHS England under challenge by pretty much everyone and their dog.

[Well apart from Chunky Stan. Who, asleep on my feet is pouring his energies into extreme comfort using an almost winning combo of warm fur, being Chunky Stan and a snooze mechanism involving occasional deep/contented sighing…]

It turns out that Sloven made nearly 300 challenges/criticisms to the original draft of the Mazars (independent) review. Wow. 300 challenges? Unprecedented focus/scrutiny by the Sloves who, a week or so after LB’s death, publicly announced he died of natural causes and circulated a briefing about the risk my blog posed to their reputation

Sloven

Sloven Board minutes. 23.7.13

[Someone recently said that Sloven made a big error in their early responses to LB’s death. Sort of suggesting the pesky mess our meddling campaign has uncovered could have been left untouched if Sloven had behaved better. I’m not sure how to begin to make sense of this so I’ll stick to what we know for now.]

Publication of the Mazars death review was delayed on the basis of Sloven’s challenge and an academic review into the independent review methodology was commissioned by NHS England. [I know]. NHS England also got an internal dataset expert to review the, er, data. [I know]. Neither reviews of the review have turned up anything changing the findings/recommendations of the original report beyond the odd tweaking.

We found out this morning that Sloven have commissioned their own review into the review. Hahahahahahaha. No. Stoppit. You what?…. Taking marking your own homework in the brave new NHS (fake) world of transparency and candour to unprecedented lows. Really??

image (18)

This postcard on our fridge repeatedly catches my eye as I reach for wine milk. We’re in a space of absurdities. A space unrecognised by Sloven, Oxfordshire County Council, NHS England, the Care Quality Commission, Monitor or the Department of Health. Evidenced by silence and in(non)action. A tumbleweed collective.

Erving Goffman talked about how much work is involved in awakening people to their true interests because their sleep is very deep.

Two and a half years since LB’s death and we clearly ain’t disturbing the slumber of anyone with any power to do anything. We can continue to try to ground the absurd though. Ground it in the human.

Here’s LB. Keeping watch on a Scottish holiday. No hint there may be trouble ahead. And why would/should he?
image (17)

A review of the review of the review…

image (16)

Nothing really to report.
Well other than candour, transparency, decency and humanity are well and truly missing from NHS England.

[Thanks to George Julian for the speech bubble text.]

Report finalisation and the National Death Service

While writing about Devon days, life, loss and inhumanity yesterday evening, I received this email from NHS England:

Report finalisation:

Following a series of comments regarding the accuracy of methods of reporting to national NHS incident reporting systems, as set out in the Mazars report, Mazars have made some further amendments to their report.
 
Publication:
We have been working towards a date of publication w/c 7th December. However, this is now not possible. There is a meeting being scheduled for the 11th December, with Mazars and NHS England national team to agree publication date and process.
This will include the planning for support for families, who may seek information post publication.
 
ERG will be sent final report ahead of publication, together with the communication handling plan.
 
Kind regards

 

ERG stands for Expert Reference Group.
WTAF stands for What the Actual Fuck?

Er, why has the publication date, process and planning support for families not been organised before now? How can further delay possibly be necessary? The report content was known in the summer. The full version circulated at the beginning of September. Why is a meeting with Mazars necessary to arrange publication date? They were commissioned to write a report. They’ve written it. It’s up to NHS England to decide on a publication date.

NHS England who fell over themselves to publish the (crap) Verita 2 report they also commissioned six weeks ago now. With no scrutiny.  They have pored over the Mazars review with microscopic intensity. Prevaricating, posturing, ignoring the significance of what this report represents and the right of the public to know. To know that our national health service has acted as a national death service for a group of people. In full view.

Scandalous, harrowing. Unforgivable. Sloven may have rushed to buff up their dire practice with a shedful of new processes but the delay in publication allows similar practice in other Trusts to go unchecked. For the deaths to continue. Extraordinary.

The problem is, I think, that these lives (and deaths) are not considered worthy enough for the magnitude of the scandal the Mazars review reveals. Does that make sense? Learning disabled people can’t be allowed to disrupt the complacency of NHS England, Sloven or the CQC. It’s almost an embarrassment. Particularly after the Winterbourne View faux activity. And talk of transforming care. All that handwringing, those national programmes, endless meetings, croissants, and fuck knows how much time, money and the like. While an NHS Trust quietly went about its business burying all the bodies.

I wrote yesterday about not knowing how I would ever get out of bed on Sunday after remembering what life used to be like. Today I’m supposed to go to a meeting in London. But I can’t get out of bed.

I feel ill.

Those husky dogs and Devon days

“Do you remember those husky dogs we saw running wild a while back, Rich? Loads of them… Where was that?”
“That holiday in Devon. Remember we were walking back from a pub lunch along some trail. The kids went back on the other track…”

This was on Sunday morning. In bed. I lay there in the half dark feeling like my breath had been stolen. Wrenched from me by being unexpectedly pitched into a memory I hadn’t meant to seek out. That long ago? Really?

I remembered the rain, the fresh air, the fun, the boredom, the lack of sun. I remembered us all just being. Chittering, bickering, bantering and loving. Hanging out. Chunky Stan took to swimming in the sea having been resolutely opposed to getting wet until then. I told Rosie off for using my umbrella to collect sea water for a sandcastle she built with Tom in between showers. We had fish and chips in Appledore and chuckled a few years later when we watched a documentary about The Jacksons house hunting there. And we squeezed into the little living room to watch the Olympics when it was simply too wet to go out.

Lying there I felt intense grief. I call it grief but that’s just a label. A word. I felt an intense agony, a feeling impossible to describe. There are no words. I’d forgotten about that pub lunch. About the walk back when we watched the kids running along, in the distance. How they made sure LB kept up. And the huskies that randomly overtook us. Making a bolt for freedom.

I missed LB so much I wondered how I would ever get up again.

I think about him constantly, in a sort of ‘careful’ or maybe self managed way. I have a whole set of (almost) distractions and strategies to make living bearable. This was unguarded thinking. Laying bare the reality of living after the death of a cub. One who died in the careless and relentlessly brutal hands of the state.

Being thrown momentarily back into that space made me realise how I’ve got used to living with pain over the last two and a half years. A pain made so much worse by the actions of Sloven, Oxfordshire County Council and now NHS England. The health, social care, commissioning triumvirate. Taking it in turns to kick the boot in. There’s still no publication date for the Mazars death review. Delay, after delay, after delay. Any talk of candour or transparency, of listening to families, of mortality review functions, of a shiny new independent (NHS) investigative body just makes me want to weep. And rage.

‘Stop talking shit,’ my brain snarls. ‘Just stop making it so much worse.’

I had an email from the police this afternoon. An email that was thoughtful, straightforward and kind. No messing, no prevarication. Just human.

Like those Devon days.

old pics

Bumping into Phil on the way home

“Hey Sara!”

“Hi Phil. How you doing?”

“Quite good really. I took a case against the DWP and I won.  I was so short of money it was pretty disastrous for a while. But I won. And they even backdated it.”

“Ah. Good for you. That must be a relief.”

“Yeah. How are you all? I hope the ‘victory’ of LB’s inquest is keeping you all.. erm, buoyed in some ways.”

“Mmm. Not great really. We’re waiting for the publication of a report NHS England are sitting on. Giving Sloven wriggle room as usual about their craphole provision.”

“Oh. That’s not good.”

“Nope. Typical establishment bastards. Anyway good to see you and good to hear your news.”

“Yes…. Sara.”

“Yep?”

“We will win one day. We just don’t know when that day will be.”
L1016799-2

Shiny new policies, ducks and ‘learning lessons’

The ‘learning lessons’ tripe regularly spouted by NHS Trust representatives in the wake of a negative report, inquest or otherwise (typically not in response to the harm caused to a person and their families) really naffs me off. We learn all the time. LB’s death wasn’t a ‘lesson’ to be learned from. He shouldn’t have died. Simple as. A point brilliantly made by AnneMarie Cunningham yesterday in a talk to a group of psychiatrists. To use ‘lessons learned’ in this context trivialises and further dehumanises LB (and everyone else who has died or experienced serious harm). Particularly when crap all is actually learned.

After the first review into LB’s death (Verita 1) was published, back in the day it made several recommendations around epilepsy care. 18 months later, during LB’s inquest, it was clear that Sloven staff members giving evidence had learned little about epilepsy. This didn’t stop Sloven’s Medical Director talking the talk about shiny new epilepsy policies and toolkits at the end of two weeks of harrowing evidence.

Similarly, when Sloven (eventually) realised that they were in a teensy bit of trouble around their response to deaths in their learning disability/mental health provision (a good 16 months after they knew an independent investigation was commissioned by NHS England), they started talking the talk about their mortality policies and processes. The Sept and Oct 2015 board papers include 65 and 70 mentions of SIRIs (Serious Investigations Requiring Investigation) and mortality respectively. There were 8 mentions in the June and July papers.

Wow. That’s good. They are taking the Mazars review seriously,’ you may be thinking.

Mmm. They are clearly taking it seriously. But I suspect the it is an unprecedented threat to their reputation. Evidenced by remarkable challenges to the content/publication of this review which remains under wraps somewhere in NHS England. If Sloven can’t bury or somehow influence the review, they will want to line their ducks up to try to distract attention from the brutality of their practice up to now.

Various changes – a central investigation team will now oversee investigation and learning, training and implementation of a new electronic investigation system continues, 50 investigators attended a 2 day investigation training course in November, so on and so on – must be in place and operational by the time the shit hits the fan. [On my more cynical days I can’t help thinking this delay is enabling these ducks to be better placed for buffing and final shiny distraction attempts. Easing the inevitable discomfort felt by pretty much every organisation involved in this scandalous and inhumane tale].

But hey ho. Sloven remain all talk and little real action. The December Board papers record that an inquest into a patient who used their mental health services was adjourned on Nov 11th until January 26th 2016. The quality of the SIRI reports provided by Sloven and Hampshire County Council were [still] not good enough. Another family facing the torture of further delay – across Christmas – caused by Sloven (and local authority) disregard and carelessness.

Their shiny new focus on SIRIs, candour and involving families can be tossed in the nearest skip. It doesn’t translate into action and they don’t give a shit about what really matters.

L1016877-2

That old devil called Mazars again

Heard this afternoon that there is more delay around the publication of the Mazars death review because now the completeness of the data the investigation team used is being questioned. There has already been an independent academic review of the methodology used but this review didn’t cover the completeness of the data. Ho hum.

Three or four weeks ago I wrote about the completely different treatment NHS England have meted out to the second review they commissioned, Verita 2, which had holes in its methodology you could post a tanker through (and, not surprisingly, uncontroversial conclusions depending on which side of the professional divide you sit). That review was published in a blink with minimal apparent scrutiny.

The Mazars review (unless a whole new set of data is suddenly found in some dark and dusty corner somewhere) has far reaching, harrowing and deeply serious implications and will (or certainly should) lead to swift and urgent action. It shines a light on beyond shameful practices and beyond the walls of the Sloven empire clearly demonstrates how the government response so far to the evidence we have of the premature deaths of a certain group of people is insubstantial frippery. Just tinkering round the edges while people continue to die and are swept aside. Carelessly.

It also shows how buckets full of courage are needed to effectively challenge systemic crap and that Mazars may be that rare beast. An independent organisation conducting truly independent, independent reviews.

L1016851-2

The birds eye view from an Oxon Commissioner

Summary of a 4615 word letter about what happened to LB below sent [to anon] by an Oxon Commissioner in 2014, forwarded to our legal team just before LB’s inquest. Beware the wrath of middling/senior public sector figures if you want to publicly document your experience of public sector provision is clearly the message here. An illustration of the toxicity of local authority/CCG practice. [Rage warning.]

L1016620-2

A tale of mother blame.

Deference to a bereaved mother means that she has been able to tell a partial story.  This is frustrating. I know through inside information that not all that’s written on the blog is accurate. I mean LB’s recent diagnosis of epilepsy was the least of the family’s worries. The children’s team told me this. His mother  often rejected support only to come back wanting it immediately. She accused social services of harassment and told the social care manager she should have read her Facebook page to know she wasn’t coping.

It’s my understanding that his mother was the one who pushed for admission. She didn’t want LB home and was pushing for a supported living service that can’t be magicked up in a few weeks. [Christ]. She refused an increase in LB’s direct payment package and never made a complaint which was obviously the sensible thing to do. 

It was clearly a difficult time if you read her blog however not everything she reported was accurate. She frequently took lines out of emails people sent her out of context and posted them. And wrote things staff disputed. A colleague was trying to get LB out of STATT but because Sara Ryan didn’t want him home, they didn’t push it. In hindsight, they should have just discharged him.

I’ve read the minutes of the Care Programme Approach meeting where bathing was discussed. There were no minuted objections from the family to the idea that he should be left alone in the bath. He hadn’t had a seizure for a year so although in retrospect, 15 minute checks look unsafe, it may have been a reasonable risk assessment at the time. His mother and her friends tried to make the CPA meeting person centred and this was why vital things could have been missed. You can’t really have person centred planning fitting with clinical health processes. [Tsk].

I know that Sara Ryan doesn’t think this but the majority of STATT staff are very caring. People cried all weekend after LB died and still people are shaken and upset by it. The huge amount of negative publicity that has been generated continues to cause them immense stress. Sara refused to speak to anyone except via her sister and has made it difficult for open honest communication.

Once STATT was closed, and SR was banging on in social media land about stuff, we’ve been unable to do our jobs properly. Patients have nowhere to go and we’re too scared to say anything because of that pesky blog. I still believe that the worst services were always outside of Oxfordshire. The trouble is that SR’s anger is unproductive and her blog is causing problems. She names and shames people and causes illness. One friend was off work sick for two days as a result of one post.  I believe her campaigning has done a lot of damage.

I originally thought LB could have died anywhere but I now know [after publication of the original Verita review] that Sloven were responsible for his death. Despite SR refusing to speak to anyone, Sloven did themselves no favours by retreating. We usually do a quality visit after an unexplained death but the police and HSE were investigating. We asked the local NHS England team for the highest level of investigation but it wasn’t until SR spoke to David Nicholson that Verita were appointed. We argued for a family advocate but weren’t listened to. We didn’t visit STATT ourselves because a lot was going on and before we were able to review the unit the [pesky] CQC pitched up. They used a new form of investigation looking at stuff they wouldn’t usually look at (medication storage, clinical waste, batteries in defibrillators and so on). The CQC inspector gave us mixed messages and I certainly felt there were some wider politics going on.

I was really shocked by the Verita findings and had no idea that LB was experiencing increasing seizure activity or that risk assessments weren’t being conducted. I believe we at OCC had no way of knowing that we weren’t being told the truth by STATT staff or that Sloven weren’t checking on things. It’s the STATT team who will have to live with LB’s death for the rest of their lives. 

I do think in hindsight we could have perhaps followed up on the blog  and done some more checks in recognition of the fact a new organisation was taking over, but we were so stretched, I don’t think we could have done much more than that.

I know LB’s death was horrific and upsetting and I know his mother will never get over it. But you can never guarantee 100% safety and it’s not good for people to be continually checked. I’m fairly confident we’d have picked up STATT’s deterioration at our next visit (we do it all the time) but sadly it was too late.

I feel immensely sorry for Sara Ryan, it is terrible she has lost her son. However, I believe bloggers have a duty to be honest, and accurate; and some of the effect of her campaigning has made things difficult not just for professionals but for other service users and families. My hope is that she can find some kind of peace with this, and that one day, she might be able to move on.

Oh fuck right off.

[I’ve never met this person].

Being free and frank (Spencer)

My incredulity barometer has crashed this afternoon. Revisiting Sloven actions since LB’s death. A letter from Katrina Percy dated 5.12.13. Freshly back from maternity leave as she sensitively mentioned. Assuring us that the investigation into LB’s death (by Verita) will be thorough and transparent and the findings openly shared with us.

Fast forward a few weeks to discussion about publication of the Verita review. Transparency my arse. The report was not to be published. Reasons? To avoid a breach of Connor’s confidentiality, to protect staff, to not prejudice ongoing staff disciplinary actions and to not prejudice future investigations because staff wouldn’t be so “free and frank” in providing their views if they’d known the report would be published. The email from Sloven’s solicitor detailing all this ends with the classic statement:

Notwithstanding the above, the Trust is conscious of its duties to be open, frank and candid [hahahahahaha]. It does recognise that there is some public interest in ensuring that serious incidents are investigated and lessons are learned. [Gnaw…] To this end, the Trust proposes to prepare a summary of the investigation findings that will be published on its website.

This was pretty staggering at the time. A Sloven written summary of an independent investigation. The report was eventually published with all names and job titles redacted. Making for tricky reading in places.

Since then, of course, we’ve had LB’s inquest. In which those staff still represented by Sloven’s legal team (they were culled like flies as the inquest drew nearer) produced witness statements including sections about their ‘relationship with Dr Ryan’. [An astonishing erasure of all other family members]. For example;

I did not speak to her very much other than saying ‘hello’. I had seen Dr Ryan shouting at a consultant and I did not want to experience that. I was scared of her. She was a bit different.

These were distressing to read especially as I thought I’d got on well with these staff. The student nurse above always took time to fill us in on what LB had been doing and how he’d been. ‘Hello’?  Reassuringly staff were honest enough to simply bat away these questions during the inquest. Scared? Nah, I respected her. And so on.

We’re left feeling sickened and shocked to the core by these dirty dealings (by an NHS organisation…) An organisation whose actions point solely to a concern with reputation management. Fakery around staff protection. As for us, LB’s family. How did we feature in Sloven’s considerations? How did they try to make sure the process was sensitively and decently handled? To ease the inevitable pain and distress we would experience? Mmm. This can be captured by this extract from meeting notes in which I was mentioned. [A meeting to discuss publication of the Verita report that clearly showed that LB’s death was preventable…]

CUbSMzLWsAE9Ejz

They didn’t even begin to try.